Which statement describes the proper priority for glove replacement when using reusable PPE?

• A. Glove replacement is a high priority
• B. Gloves can be reused indefinitely
• C. Glove replacement is unnecessary when dry
• D. Gloves are optional for most tasks

Answer: (A)

Skin protection relies on a reliable barrier, and gloves are the main line of defense when handling pesticides. Reusable gloves can be damaged, torn, or permeated by chemicals even if they look fine or feel dry. Because a compromised glove can let pesticides reach the skin, replacing gloves becomes a high-priority step whenever there is any doubt about their integrity or after completing a task that involved exposure. This is why the correct choice emphasizes that glove replacement is a high priority.

Gloves cannot be reused indefinitely; they should be cleaned and inspected and replaced if damaged or contaminated. Dryness does not guarantee safety, since chemicals can permeate through dry gloves. And gloves are not optional for most pesticide tasks—the PPE needed for protection is required to prevent skin exposure.